Student Judicial Board
The Reed College Student Judicial Board serves a vital role in a community governed by an Honor Principle. If community members are unable to work out an alleged Honor Principle violation amongst themselves, and formal mediation fails to result in an agreeable solution, then community members may submit a complaint to the Judicial Board for more formal adjudication.
The Complainant does not need to be the alleged victim. Specifically, Judicial Board hears complaints brought by members of the Reed community concerning alleged violations of the honor principle as well as college policies, rules, guidelines, and/or contracts by students. The Judicial Board acts as a fact-finding body that establishes, on a standard of more likely than not (preponderance of evidence), the sequence of events in question.
The Judicial Board then determines what events in question constitute violations and recommends sanctions appropriate to the circumstances of the case. The Judicial Board’s findings and recommendations are then submitted to the President of the College or their designee. As the final authority in judicial matters at Reed, the President or designee then decides whether to accept or alter the Judicial Board’s recommendations.
Composition and Training
The Judicial Board consists of twelve full-time students who have never been found guilty of a violation under the process of the Student Judicial Board Code and who are in good academic standing. The Student Senate appoints members to Judicial Board as needed—typically once per semester with a term of one year.
The Judicial Board attends an extensive training each semester on the relevant laws, the Judicial Board Code, college policy, and the college’s adjudicative processes. Additionally, the entire Judicial Board attends training each semester with the rest of the Title IX Board on sexual misconduct adjudication.
For more information, please see the Adjudication links found in the upper left corner of the page.